Wayne L. Morse United States Courthouse

by | 31. Jul 2012

Feature | Government

us_courthouse_1.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

Discrete object buildings – a reference back to an earlier single room courthouse model.

American courthouse architecture has moved away from the use of symbolic iconography to communicate the importance of the judicial process. Courtrooms are now routinely located in generic office towers – effectively repositioning the proceedings as business as usual – thus obscuring the gravity of the judicial process by excising the symbolism inherent in the traditional courtroom.

The Wayne L. Morse United States Courthouse seeks to challenge this trend by expressing the courtrooms as discrete object buildings – a reference back to an earlier single room courthouse model.

us_courthouse_2.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_3.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

The building is composed of two distinct strata, the honorific and the quotidian. The iconic elements are the courtrooms themselves, located in articulated pavilions that float above an orthogonal two-story plinth that houses office and administrative spaces. Their forms refer to the fluid nature of the American Judicial System – a system that is designed to remain flexible by being continuously challenged and reinterpreted by the proceedings of the courts.

The formal and structural organization of the plinth is mimetic of the Cartesian layout of the city, and thus represents the more static nature of Eugene’s urban fabric upon which the organic and independent shapes of the courtrooms rest.

us_courthouse_4.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_5.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith Ribbons of steel envelop the pavilions, articulating the movement sequence between the three courtroom clusters. The waiting areas and public corridors that connect the courtroom pavilions provide views to the surrounding mountains and a perception of light and the passage of time.

The entry occurs at the moment where the two systems collide, in a large open atrium, framed by the base’s strict grid and sculpted by the fluid forms above.

us_courthouse_6.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_7.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_8.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_9.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_10.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

us_courthouse_11.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

The shapes of the pavilions emanate from the autonomous courtrooms themselves, whose soft forms are constricted to direct the focus to the witness stand and judge’s bench. The jury boxes are partially recessed, isolated in an articulated space that refers to the juror’s role as both observer and participant.

us_courthouse_12.jpg
Photo: ©Tim Griffith

In the courtrooms, natural light is admitted through two thick-walled, large apertures–one above the judge’s bench, and one above the spectator seating. The effect is that of a freestanding building, a unique and dignified place in which the court’s raison d’être is architecturally legible.

us_courthouse_13.jpg
Photo courtesy Morphosis
Site Plan

us_courthouse_14.jpg
Photo courtesy Morphosis
Study Models

us_courthouse_15.jpg
Rendering courtesy Morphosis

us_courthouse_16.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Plan Level One

us_courthouse_17.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Plan Level Four

us_courthouse_18.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Roof Plan

us_courthouse_19.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Section looking West

us_courthouse_20.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Section looking East

us_courthouse_21.jpg
Drawing courtesy Morphosis
Section looking North

INFORMATION

CITYEugene, Oregon
COUNTRYUSA
CONSTRUCTION YEAR2006
SIZE270,000 ft2
ARCHITECTDLR Group
Jim Conley
Jason Wandersee

CLIENT

CONTRACTOR